Jackson votes for 95 (score >85), and wins. The highest score among eligible candidates is 95, second is 92. The bonus of 10 is awarded to the winner, and since he supports the highest scorer (95), he receives the bonus. His total score is his approved scores (95 + 92) plus 10 — no— base score is the approbation scores of all candidates, but election simulation scores are those values. Likely, the 80,78,etc., are the raw opinion scores, and Jacksons total should reflect total approval for eligible candidates. But the problem likely defines total points score as the sum of the scores of the top two eligible candidates plus bonus.

Mon, 04 May 2026 19:53:07 +0000

**Jackson Votes for 95 — Why He Won, and What It Means for Voters in the U.S** In a quietly significant moment on the political stage, Jackson earned a decisive victory with a simulation score of 95 — the highest among eligible candidates — followed by 92. A bonus of 10 points was awarded to the top scorer, consolidating Jackson’s win. This outcome reflects a growing alignment of civic sentiment and signals a shift in voter priorities across key communities. The simulation, though electoral in nature, captures how trust, policy alignment, and public assessment intersect in modern democratic engagement. --- **Why Jackson’s Support and Victory Stand Out**